[WikiEN-l] Interpreting merge votes (was Wikipedia's provable anti-expertise bias)
Ray Saintonge
saintonge at telus.net
Sun Nov 20 21:10:04 UTC 2005
Sam Korn wrote:
>On 11/20/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>They should be voting "merge and delete", then. If they just vote
>>"merge" then calling that a delete vote is itself putting words into
>>mouths, whereas keeping is the default.
>>
>>
>Merge and delete is not a possible vote. People should not have to
>vote in such a specific way to prevent vote-hijacking.
>
>
People can vote any way they want. If people vote that way then it's
possible. I don't know anything about the "vote-hijacking" jargon that
you are trying to introduce.
Ec
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list