[WikiEN-l] Interpreting merge votes (was Wikipedia's provable anti-expertise bias)

[Ray Saintonge]

Sam Korn wrote:

>On 11/20/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
>  
>
>>They should be voting "merge and delete", then. If they just vote
>>"merge" then calling that a delete vote is itself putting words into
>>mouths, whereas keeping is the default.
>>    
>>
>Merge and delete is not a possible vote.  People should not have to
>vote in such a specific way to prevent vote-hijacking.
>  
>
People can vote any way they want.  If people vote that way then it's 
possible.  I don't know anything about the "vote-hijacking" jargon that 
you are trying to introduce.

Ec