[WikiEN-l] Re: Totally unscientific investigation...
Poor, Edmund W
Edmund.W.Poor at abc.com
Tue Nov 15 17:14:06 UTC 2005
> > Yes, I'm an eventualist. From my point of view, Wikipedia
> has a long,
> > long way to go, and that's not a bad thing. It's that the
> sum total
> > of useful human knowledge is so vast. There are many subject areas
> > that Wikipedia's coverage is scant or wholly lacking. Yet, at the
> > same time, there are articles on Wikipedia that are better than ANY
> > other online resource. I am sure there are some that are
> better than
> > ANY published article, on or offline. Isn't that something to feel
> > good about?
I would feel good about it, if I believed it. <sarcasm>Please list BOTH
of the articles you're referring to. </sarcasm>
If there are several, or even dozens or hundreds of such articles, I'm
sure ALL of our readers would like to know which ones they are. Is there
a [[Category:Best online article]] or something?
Ed Poor
Quality Control Expert
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list