[WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee members granted checkuser tool
David Gerard
dgerard at gmail.com
Mon Nov 14 10:34:13 UTC 2005
geni wrote:
>On 11/13/05, Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Public perception is not required.
>However it normaly exists. I can't at short notice think of any cases
>involveing it's use where no one had raised any questions.
You have that backwards: the cases are already questionable, then I do
a checkuser. There are lots and lots and lots you don't see.
Read the FAQ I just posted: Q. Why aren't there public logs?
- d.
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list