[WikiEN-l] And the bad faith continues from Wikipedia. ALL ADMINSare Rogue A

[Cranston Snord]

Isn't hypocrisy grand?

"Anyone can edit" - but if Admins don't agree with your edits they will 
block you upon a whim.

"If you believe the block is unwarranted email the one who blocked you" - 
which will of course be completely useless when you have an admin pushing a 
particular POV.

"Or else you can email the Wikien-l mailing list" - except you really can't, 
because it's a clique of admins who couldn't care less about the rules, just 
slapping each other on the back for making sure they're the only ones in 
Wikipedia. And actually making complaints will get you banned.

YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF SORRY HYPOCRITES.

>From: Christopher Larberg <christopherlarberg at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: Christopher Larberg <christopherlarberg at gmail.com>,English 
>Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
>Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] And the bad faith continues from Wikipedia. ALL 
>ADMINSare Rogue Admins
>Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:34:14 -0700
>
>On 5/30/05, Cranston Snord <wikipediaisstupid at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > All Wikipedia Admins ARE Rogue Admins.
>If all Wikipedia admins are rogue admins, what constitutes a non-rogue 
>admin?
>
>Does this mean I get to call myself "The Rogue"? I've always wanted a
>cool nickname.
>
>--Slowking Man
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/