[WikiEN-l] cool it
Cranston Snord
enviroknot at hotmail.com
Mon May 30 23:49:13 UTC 2005
All fine and good.
What she has done is still against policy, and I am still blocked.
And she HAS been persecuting me.
Making a big email about why someone should or shouldn't be called a rogue
admin, when the admin's gaming of the system, harassment of editors, and
behavior in violation of policy is NOT addressed is ridiculous.
I'll agree to stop calling her a rogue admin if Wikipedia policy is actually
followed and I see that I've been unblocked.
-Enviroknot
>From: "steven l. rubenstein" <rubenste at ohiou.edu>
>Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>To: wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
>Subject: [WikiEN-l] cool it
>Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 19:27:03 -0400
>
>I am no one to throw stones, so let's just say that I know perfectly well
>what it is like to lose my temper and to be unable to fight the urge to use
>harsh, even insulting language. Fortunately, when this happens there are
>usually plenty of people who tell me to stop, or even to apologize.
>
>Can we please stop using the phrase "rogue admin," especially in the
>subject space for the e-mail.
>
>This isn't about the fact that I think SlimVirgin is a dedicated editor who
>has added much to Wikipedia. We can discuss questions of improper action,
>or possible reasons for it, here or more appropriately at the Admin
>bulletin board, incident report page, whatever. But it doesn't matter who
>you are talking about. This phrase "rogue admin" is inflammatory,
>unnecessarily insulting, and has no place at Wikipedia. If we as a
>community or some body representing the community decides that a sysop
>should be de-sysopped, okay, we de-sysop the person. But until that
>happens, they are an administrator. Period. If you don't like what that
>administrator has done, fine, but focus on the action. And certainly don't
>go around calling someone a rogue administrator -- this insults the whole
>community because the person using this phrase is abrogating the authority
>to decide who is or is not a legitimate administrator. You may not like
>what they did, you may not like them personally, but as long as they are
>administrators, call them that, or don't call them anything at all.
>
>And for all those who do not like the phrase "rogue admin" or who do not
>think X deserves to be called rogue admin, please change the subject
>heading of your e-mail. Will it screw up the thread? Don't worry, anyone
>going through the archived list-serve will figure it out.
>
>Steve
>
>Steven L. Rubenstein
>Associate Professor
>Department of Sociology and Anthropology
>Bentley Annex
>Ohio University
>Athens, Ohio 45701
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list