[WikiEN-l] RFC
Henry Kissinger
hkissinger at diplomats.com
Sun Jun 26 02:20:20 UTC 2005
I apologize for my ignorance. I really don't want to contribute to
articels or writng. I may have inadvertantly pissed off the wrong people,
and for this I apologize. I may be barking up the wrong tree. However, if
I'm not, just let me know who not to offend. I wouldn't mind adding my
single lone addition to other ventures if I possibly could.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry Kissinger"
To: "Jack Lynch" , "English Wikipedia"
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] RFC
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:10:30 -0500
>
> I replied to the other I believe. Ask anything u like and I will
answer.
> I am a total loner with my prankstering. Excuse the hack of
language.
>
> HK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jack Lynch"
> To: "Dan Grey" , "English Wikipedia"
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] RFC
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:55:08 +0200
>
> >
> > I have found that these "like minded editors" solicited by talk
> page,
> > email, IRC or whatever are the worst thing possible in every
> > situation. There is no surer way to enforce POV or enact mob
> > psychology.
> >
> > Jack (Sam Spade)
> >
> > On 6/23/05, Dan Grey wrote:
> > > On 23/06/05, jfdwolff at doctors.org.uk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > RFC, however, is completely inadequate. Community response to
> > > RFCs is very modest, even (or especially) when controversial
> > > articles are being discussed. Only recruiting like-minded
editors
> > > through their talkpages seems to help. RFC or otherwise, it
often
> > > leads to no agreement between the litigants, and mediation is
> > > sought etc etc. By that time the experienced user is already
> > > tired and wants to go back to normal editing.
> > > >
> > > > Jfdwolff
> > >
> > > In the last few weeks, several of us have made an effort to
> respond to
> > > RfCs and try and 'mediate' on an ad-hoc basis - with good
> results, I
> > > might add.
> > >
> > > And as a result of a suggestion by Maurreen in response to
Raul's
> > > RfAr/RfC, we've recently made an overhaul of the RfC content
> section -
> > > with the results being very well recieved.
> > >
> > > So please, don't write RfCs off.
> > >
> > >
> > > Dan
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
> --
> ___________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
> http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list