[WikiEN-l] Re: Requests for adminship reform

[Chris Jenkinson]

On 6/24/05, Chris Jenkinson <talrias at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am concerned, as some people have already voiced, that requesting
> adminship is becoming a popularity contest. Some people are elected
> with huge majorities, with a couple of dissenting voices from people
> who have had disagreements with the electee in the past. Without a
> reason for voting, it's difficult to tell what people are voting for.
> Are they voting for the person's character, or something else? I think
> Boothy443 is right to question the voting procedure (however I don't
> agree with the method of doing it). I am attempting to demean those
> admins who have been elected to adminship with large majorities and
> turnouts - but what does 50 names really show?

I of course mean "I am not attempting to demean [..]" :) 

Additional discussion of this is at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Talrias/Adminship_reform

Chris
-- 
Chris Jenkinson
http://talrias.net/