[WikiEN-l] Re: Example vs. Original research

[Alphax]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Haukur Þorgeirsson wrote:
>>Ultimately all of our opinions are just one more point of view, and
>>every statement is probabilistic.  The near sphericity of the earth is a
>>POV with a very high probability of truth.  If all Wikipedians (and we
>>are many) hold that POV than the NPOV will also be in that range as a
>>consensus   Why would it be necessary to add that qualification if
>>no-one is disputing the shape?
> 
> 
> So, your answer to my question: "How many fundamentalists does it take to
> make something controversial?" is "One. As long as she's a Wikipedian."
> 
> Or am I reading you wrong? :)
> 

Well, that does it for me. I'm going to stick {{unreferenced}},
{{NPOV}}, {{disputed}} and {{whatwereyousmokingwhenyouwrotethis}} on as
many articles as possible :)

Or start nominating some FAs for VFD as being uncyclopedic. Starting
with [[Xenu]]...

- --
Alphax                      |   /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred   |   \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613  |    X   Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up    |   / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC55uJ/RxM5Ph0xhMRAxtfAJ9IU7nSRmaQ6bX1WG7rALcUDx8jPgCaAuDG
EyysvZji12PkCBQGlnjfLSg=
=t6HI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----