[WikiEN-l] Re: Consensus

[Daniel P. B. Smith]

> From: "Charles Matthews" <charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com>
>
> "Dan Grey" wrote
>
>> "Consensus" can only mean everyone agrees - and when the hell that
>> does that happen? Next to never.
>
> Consensus may be a slightly fuzzy term, but it doesn't mean that.   
> In fact
> WP's standard way of operating is a rather good illustration of  
> what it does
> mean: a mixture across the community of those who are largely  
> agreed, some
> who disagree but 'agree to disagree' without disaffection, those  
> who don't
> agree but give low priority to the given issue, those who disagree  
> strongly
> but concede that there is a community view and respect it on that  
> level,
> some vocal and unreconciled folk, some who operate 'outside the  
> law'.  You
> find out whether you have consensus, if not unanimity, when you try  
> to build
> on it.
>
> Charles

Well said!


--
Jean is going to be bicycling 83 miles in the Pan Mass Challenge in  
August, raising money for cancer research. Her profile is at http:// 
www.pmc.org/mypmc/profiles.asp?Section=story&eGiftID=JS0417