[WikiEN-l] Re: Re: Improving ArbCom's lot medium-term

[Fred Bauder]

In real life such "flunkies" are called lawyers, on Wikipedia  
Advocates. We could require advocates. However our experience with  
advocates is that they pay no attention to presenting evidence, a  
real lawyers actual function, but engage in weird Wikilawyering that  
harms their clients cause. Challenging our jurisdiction and demanding  
that we all recuse ourselves is not going to work.

Fred

On Jul 12, 2005, at 7:27 AM, Phil Boswell wrote:

> "Fred Bauder" <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote in
> message news:B845F36D-E8A8-4C7C-B5F1-A683CE6FAC55 at ctelco.net...
>
>> We have restricted the amount that can be presented. But what is   
>> really
>> needed is better organized evidence. Most time and energy   
>> expended by
>> Arbitrators goes into trying to figure out what is  significant.
>>
>
>
> Many is the time when I've tried to puzzle out badly-formatted  
> evidence and
> my editing fingers have been itching to re-format into some sort of  
> readable
> state, but there's this notice which says not to.
>
> Maybe the ArbCom could "employ" some flunkies to janitorise the  
> evidence and
> wrangle it into a standard, readable, format.
> -- 
> Phil
> [[en:User:Phil Boswell]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>