[WikiEN-l] Improving ArbCom's lot medium-term

Jon thagudearbh at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jul 11 19:54:40 UTC 2005


It seems the ArbCom is in freefall - only 6 of the 12 still active. Can't say I'm surprised - I'm more surprised we found 12 volunteers to wade through the detritus that it RfAr for no pay! All I can say is that their efforts are appreciated.
 
Clearly something needs to be done to help the matter. I understand the remaining ArbCom members and Jimbo are discussing with others whether they would take on the role in the short term. But what can be done going forward to the end of year elections?
 
I don't want comments on the details (which would clearly need to be looked at in due course). But here's an idea that might be more appealing - particularly to those who find themselves on ArbCom (hopefully through volunteering):
 
1. ArbCom to have 24 members (ie enough to cope with absences, resignations, etc)
2. 7 Arbitrators to hear each case - the arbitrators to hear each case being decided on a taxi rank system (amongst those making themselves available in any given week or fortnight)
3. The first Arbitrator in the queue will be responsible for writing up the initial findings of fact and proposed decisions (this is both to share the workload, plus to ensure that one arbitrator does not gain undue influence by writing them all - this is not a criticism of Fred, who tends to be the first arbitrator at present to write these - more an acknowledgment that it would be better to get a variety of opinions - clearly if the other arbitrators disagree with the findings and proposed decision, it will be rejected anyway, as is the case now).
4. If the number of Arbitrators drops below a certain level - 18 maybe - more Arbitrators are to be co-opted (by three-quarters acceptance by active arbitrators, say) to bring the level up to 21, say.
5. Only Wikipedians on the English Wikipedia that are Arbitrators as at 30 November are eligible for the year end elections (to eliminate trolls and WPians that are clearly undesirable as Arbitrators from the election) - maybe a little harsh - but if publicised in advance would allow all interested candidates that aren't admins to apply for adminship.
 
Comments?
 
Jon (Jguk)

		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PCcalling worldwide with voicemail


More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list