[WikiEN-l] Thoughts on the process of requesting adminship
David Gerard
fun at thingy.apana.org.au
Sun Jul 3 20:11:06 UTC 2005
Nathan J. Yoder (njyoder at energon.org) [050704 06:09]:
> > Obviously there was no consensus that these editors were trustworthy;
> > someone is not "trustworthy" simply because you believe them to be so. And
> > consensus is still an important part of the Wikipedia process.
> How is a majority vote NOT consensus?
The idea is that an overwhelming majority may *indicate* consensus. For
RFA, that's taken to mean >80%; 75-80% is at bureaucrat discretion.
- d.
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list