[WikiEN-l] Creationism is not horse-shit, it's pseudo-science

[Jtkiefer]

Erik Moeller wrote:

> Jtkiefer:
>
>>    Creationism is a prickly problem, wikipedia can't really take 
>> either side due to the fact that no matter what you write on it it's 
>> almost impossible to avoid POV pushing.
>
>
> Stating that creationism is pseudoscience is not POV-pushing. Maybe 
> Intelligent Design, which is a bit more controversial -- but 
> creationism as in "God created the World", where it makes "scientific" 
> claims, is pretty much universally regarded as pseudoscience by people 
> from existing scientific disciplines.
>
> Erik
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>
>

Your right calling creationism a science would be POV pushing, but if 
you take the stance that creationism is anything, science, 
pseudo-science, legend, myth, total bullshit... you're still gonna piss 
someone off which is an inherent problem with having an open medium like 
wikipedia.

-Jtkiefer