[WikiEN-l] original research, sources, and verification

[JAY JG]

>Tony Sidaway wrote:
>
>Quality of source is usually (but not always) POV.  We're supposed to be
>writing NPOV articles.
>A caveat such as "warning: the article relies on population projections
>that were proven by events to be grossly in error" is fine and NPOV.

I doubt it would be fine according to the people who happen to believe those 
projections are correct.  You sentence seems anything but NPOV.

Jay.