[WikiEN-l] original research, sources, and verification

[Stan Shebs]

JAY JG wrote:

>
>> There should be a way to do it that the proponents would  not reasonably
>> object to. For instance, [[Rudolf Hess]] contains an external link to 
>> the
>> [[Institute for Historical Review]] which notes that they are Holocaust
>> revisionists, which they do claim to be. And both the majority 
>> against such
>> revisionism and the minority for it know exactly what "Holocaust
>> revisionism" means; and anyone who doesn't can follow the link on
>> "revisionist".
>
>
> Hmm, Historical revisionist seems a bit too easy.  How would you 
> characterize that link I gave in the earlier e-mail, in way that 
> warned people what kind of site it was, but the people running it 
> could agree with?

"The people running this website claim to reveal the truth about 
everything".

Stan