[WikiEN-l] Re: User:Everyking

[David Gerard]

csherlock at ljh.com.au (csherlock at ljh.com.au) [050119 09:53]:

> Surely a rollback should be classed as a revert?


Rollbacks of simple vandalism (as defined by policy) are not counted as
reverts for 3RR, and evidently they're not reverts as we know them in the
design of Mediawiki either.

Using rollback to perform an article edit that constitutes a revert in the
3RR sense would be a *severely* dodgy thing for a 3RR-blocked admin to do,
though. I'd hope Everyking wouldn't do that.


- d.