[WikiEN-l] The 3RR policy should not always be blindly followed

[JAY JG]

>Charles Matthews wrote:
>
>When something is already unverifiable, highly partisan POV, I wonder why 
>it
>needs to be labelled 'original research' as well.

Because what is "POV" is often highly contested, especially by people who 
aren't that familiar with the policy.  Original research is often easier to 
discern and prove when the person in question has no sources to back up his 
theory or belief.  Not that I haven't run into the "this isn't original 
research, these are simply the facts" defence as well.

Jay.