[WikiEN-l] Re: 3 reverts in 24 hours is allowed by not condoned

[Daniel P.B.Smith]

> One point to remember about 3RR: if you get as far as *three* reverts 
> in 24
> hours, something's badly wrong. Allowing three reverts in 24 hours is 
> one
> of the things Wikipedia allows but does not condone.

Hear, hear!

I revert once, with a terse edit comment.

XYZ reverts.

I revert again, with a careful edit comment saying "see Talk" and a 
good reason in the talk page.

If, at this point, XYZ reverts again, I don't know what the most 
effective thing to do is. But I do know one thing for sure: reverting a 
third time is not it.

Now if--and the thing is possible--goaded beyond endurance, I were to 
continue with further reverts at various points in time... well, jeez, 
I'm skating on thin ice. I know it, everyone knows it. And suppose an 
admin _did_ block me, why would I even bother to complain? Why not just 
accept the slap on the wrist and wait out the 24 hours?

--
Daniel P. B. Smith, dpbsmith at verizon.net
"Elinor Goulding Smith's Great Big Messy Book" is now back in print!
Sample chapter at http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/messy.html
Buy it at http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1403314063/