[WikiEN-l] On Transparency
Hermione1980
slytherinchaser49 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 27 20:50:45 UTC 2005
What makes admins so special? A lot of them are mostly
janitors. Non-admins do the majority of content edits,
which is what Wikipedia's credibility is based on. Why
not require a real name, address, email, and phone
number to register? That would do more for
accountability for contributions.
I don't find it hard to believe at all that admins are
showing "resistance" to having their identity
revealed. There are a lot of wack jobs on the Internet
that could use that information for nefarious
purposes. Frankly, when revealing one's real name
becomes a requirement for adminship, I'll ask to be
desysopped.
-Hermione1980
--- Steven Ericsson Zenith <steven at semeiosis.com>
wrote:
> A brief contrarian point of view. If Wikipedia is
> to succeed in any
> measure to move beyond its tabloid status then
> transparency is essential.
>
> That is, every admin must necessarily have their
> identity exposed and it
> surprises me somewhat to see the resistance here -
> and I find it hard to
> justify.
>
> Authority (in the sense of an encyclopedia) comes
> because the
> individuals involved are transparent and respected
> in some conventional
> sense. Hidden identity provides no basis for
> authority since the
> landscape of individuals is unknown and the changes
> to that landscape
> impossible to track. Such that, even if a group of
> anonymous admins is
> able to command respect for a period, there is no
> guarantee, no way to
> judge, that a group of admins have the same capacity
> in the future.
> Indeed, if the current group of admins do manage to
> establish public
> confidence then the public is immediately at risk
> since that group can
> be opaquely usurped.
>
> The short end is that for the long term welfare of
> Wikipedia admins -
> all contributors - need to be transparent -
> otherwise Wikipedia is
> simply a propaganda engine.
>
> That the journal Nature should give any support to
> the scientific
> articles in Wikipedia is a cause of great concern -
> since Wikipedia is
> not a specialist encyclopedia they have by inference
> given unfounded
> credence to the whole.
>
> With respect,
> Steven
> --
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stevenzenith
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list