[WikiEN-l] verifiability

[Neil Harris]

steven l. rubenstein wrote:
>
> Steve Bennett wrote:
>
>> t would be good to have some kind of understood process for how claims
>> are first described as verifiable/unverifiable, then become
>> verified/unverified.  This process is extremely haphasard at the moment.
>>
>>
>> Steve
>
>
> I agree.  Do you have any concrete suggestions?  You and a number of 
> other people have made some fine points; perhaps we can move this 
> discussion to the Verifiability talk page and start discussing how to 
> put these ideas into practice?
>
> Steve
>
Well, whatever the eventual solution is, I would expect it to involve 
Magnus' workflow system in some way.

-- Neil