[WikiEN-l] The George W. Bush article: is this still a wiki?

[Brian]

On 12/15/05, Brian <brian0918 at gmail.com> wrote:

>>But, the reality is, the majority of the George W. Bush article is
>>alright and in need of little editing.
>>    
>>
>
>
>You says it's alright and in little need of editing, so we don't have
>to worry about the fact that you are deliberately taking steps that
>you know will hinder editing of the article.
>
>You appear to have admitted that you're deliberately taking steps to
>maliciously hinder the editing of this article.  I think that can be
>regarded as vandalism.  Please stop it, the article does not belong to
>you and you do not have the right to render bona fide editing of the
>article extremely difficult.
>
If it's vandalism, it's the first vandalism to be universally supported 
on an article's talk page. Thank you for picking one sentence to attack 
and ignoring the rest of my statement.