[WikiEN-l] SPOV threatens NPOV

[Fred Bauder]

See

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? 
title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/ 
William_M._Connolley&diff=9512576&oldid=9512379

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? 
title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/ 
William_M._Connolley&oldid=9512805

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 
Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Pseudoscience

Fred

The statement of
On Dec 12, 2005, at 12:20 PM, stevertigo wrote:

> Something else to talk about:
>
> Some of our rather intelligent sciency people seem to
> have an unusual inability to distinguish science from
> neutrality. Ultimately, they tend to argue that
> articles should hold a defacto deference to what is
> essentially a Scientific Point of View, rather than a
> Neutral Point of View.
>
> How best to single these people out and correct their
> behaviour? Any examples of articles in question? Isnt
> the term "pseudoscience" a POV pejorative from the
> SPOV?
>
> Stevertigo
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>