[WikiEN-l] Questions about the "Wikipedia screenshot" category of images
Sherool
jamydlan at online.no
Wed Dec 7 01:18:23 UTC 2005
How exactly should these images be treated? I'm talking about the image
tag <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikipedia-screenshot>
and it's category
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Screenshots_of_Wikipedia>. The
template only says that Wikipedia text is licensed under GFDL and that
Wikipedia is copyright of Wikimedia, but it doesn't rely address the issue
of the copyright status for the image itself.
According to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags>
it's a "fair use" tag (that's where it's listed anyway), but we are not
currently treating it as such. Gmaxwell's bot originally tagged these
images as "far use orphans" if they where not used in articles, but after
a storm of protests (well 3-4 anyway, I raised some questions myself back
then) he (reluctantly) excluded them from his bot. Problem is you can't
rely argue that they are free images, as many of them include either
copyrighted GUI elements from the users browser and OS, and a lot of
others include copyrighted "fair use" images from articles.
The way I see it we have 3 choices.
1) Keep using it as a semi-free "special" case, maybe we can argue that
the screenshot as a whole give enough context to declare the inclusion of
copyrighted images to be within fair use or some such (IANAL).
2) Make it a GFDL tag, and run an extensive cleanup project to crop, blur
or otherwise remove all copyrighted elements from the screenshots (and
clean out other mis-tagged junk).
3) Confirm that it's a fair use tag, and delete all the images that have
not been used in any articles for at least 7 days (in other words most, if
not all of them).
Any thoughts? Whatever status they should have needs to be made more clear
IMHO.
--
[[User:Sherool]]
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list