[WikiEN-l] Re: Node and Toki Pona

[Anthere]

just an idea...

What about a global "arbitration committee" to manage such issues as a 
global ban ???

ant

Anthere a écrit:
> 
> 
> Phil Sandifer a écrit:
> 
>> My two cents -
>>
>> What node did was stupid and immature, and he should have known that  
>> blanking an entire encyclopedia was not the way to offer his 
>> concerns.  He should have posted to the list, on meta, or somewhere 
>> else that he  thought the entire encyclopedia might be copyvio. It 
>> could have been  discussed, and bot rollbacks wouldn't have been 
>> necessary.
>>
>> As node has, to say the least, been a source of difficulty and  
>> disruption in the past, I can see why there's a significant movement 
>> to  throw the book at him.
>>
>> My feeling is that a project-wide ban is a very, very big step, 
>> though,  and should be reserved. I think node is pretty clearly on 
>> warning here,  and that further displays of such immaturity will 
>> pretty much not be  tolerated by anyone.
>>
>> -Snowspinner
> 
> 
> 
> I strongly agree with snowspinner on this.
> 
> Node certainly needs a strong warning (which should include a temporary 
> block of course), he needs to discuss with people on this, but that does 
> not justify imho, a ban on all projects.
> 
> I think blocking someone on all projects requires either
> * approval from all projects (or at least most... )
> * or an offense much bigger than this one.
> 
> This does not mean I do not consider what he did was not bad, but that 
> such a project-wide decision does not scale the fault.
> A project wide banning should only be made for an offense damaging the 
> whole project. This was not the case.
> 
> 
> anthere
> 
> 
>> On Sep 22, 2004, at 12:28 AM, Angela_ wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:11:47 -0700, Matt Brown 
>>> <morven at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the edification of the rest of us, what is this regarding?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Basically, an anon IP replaced practically every page on the toki pona
>>> Wikipedia with a copyright violation template because he didn't
>>> believe the language itself was GFDL. I reverted this because I
>>> thought it was GFDL. Tim announced the vandal was node-ue and proposed
>>> a project-wide ban, Raul654 banned node-ue on en and meta, Danny
>>> convinced Raul654 to unblock him, and Sonja, the creator of the
>>> language, said toki pona "is obviously released under the GFDL". See
>>> http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2004-September/ 
>>> 017331.html
>>> and other emails in that thread.
>>>
>>> Angela.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>>> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>>> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>
>>
>>