On 17 Sep 2004, at 21:26, Delirium wrote:
the slants are generally towards what you might expect given the sorts of people working on Wikipedia: rather strongly pro-civil-liberties, moderately anti-US (but with proper caveats usually mentioned), vaguely anti-religion, etc
ANTI-religion?!?! ANTI-US !?!?!
Well, then I must have been dreaming when I removed all these "what would Jesus say" - Christiospams from totally unrelated topics. And the folks insinuating that the "Vietcong", not the U.S. had used Napalm in Vietnam must have been entirely correct as well, I guess.
Yea, right.
- ropers