[WikiEN-l] Re: RickK ?????

[R E Broadley]

Rebecca,

I apologise for misrepresenting your post by not including the topic 
title. It was not my intention to misrepresent it, and if this was an 
honest mistake by RickK, than I apologise to RickK also. It might not be 
reckless editing, but I still consider it to be editing without due care 
and attention, of which I've spotted a lot of these from him recently. 
If it were driving, he'd have lost his license by now.

Ed


Rebecca wrote:

>Please. If you're trying to make this out as something nasty on the
>part of Rick, you're barking up the wrong tree.
>
>It was a funny error, which is why the section on Rick's talk page was
>entitled "Teehee".
>
>I suggest you actually read the edit before suggesting that it has
>malicious intent and misrepresenting my post.
>
>-- ambi
>
>
>On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:30:51 +0000, R E Broadley
><20041111 at stardate.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>  
>
>>Well, I'm not the only one who understood, the person who left the
>>original comment in his talk page
>>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:RickK&oldid=7921955#Teehee]
>>said "I don't know if you realised, but at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion
>><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion>, you cut
>>User:Vague Rant <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vague_Rant>'s comment
>>in half and declared that the first half of his comment was by an anon
>>and was therefore not counted".
>>
>>
>>
>>Daniel P.B.Smith wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>From: R E Broadley <20041111 at stardate.freeserve.co.uk>
>>>>Subject: [WikiEN-l] user RickK - vote rigging
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Someone else spotted RickK up to no good, and referred to the following
>>>>on his talk page:-
>>>>
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?
>>>>title=Wikipedia%3AVotes_for_deletion%2FBlogsome&diff=7896162&oldid=7894
>>>>630
>>>>
>>>>The diff above is all by RickK in one edit, so I can't see how he can
>>>>possibly claim he thought the vote was by an anonymous person.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Having reviewed the diff, I'm completely puzzled. I don't understand
>>>what you think the problem is, and I don't understand how this is
>>>"vote  rigging."
>>>
>>>--
>>>Daniel P. B. Smith, dpbsmith at verizon.net
>>>"Elinor Goulding Smith's Great Big Messy Book" is now back in print!
>>>Sample chapter at http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/messy.html
>>>Buy it at http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1403314063/
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>WikiEN-l mailing list
>>>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>>>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>WikiEN-l mailing list
>>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>  
>