[WikiEN-l] About the reliability of the Wikipedia process and content

[Daniel Mayer]

--- Shane King <wikipedia at dontletsstart.com> wrote:
> If you accept that conclusion, then you must also accept the conclusion
> than any changes a review board makes to an article could also make the
> article worse.

The review board reviews, they would not edit except as individuals. A review
may reject an article but have a list of items that would have to be addressed
before the article could be put up for review again. The quality of the process
depends on the mix of people involved and their level of dedication. So yes,
results may vary. But that is no different than dead-tree encyclopedias. 

-- mav

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com