[WikiEN-l] the AC needs people with free time and interest

[Ray Saintonge]

Delirium wrote:

> Often parties to disputes will dump literally hundreds of links to 
> edit histories, and engage in lengthy multi-page accusations and 
> counter-accusations.  Someone has to sort through that and try to make 
> sense of it.  It's not a particularly interesting job, of course.

IMHO much of this stems from an inability to impose a standard of 
relevance on evidence.  If you are discussing someone's specific 
wrongdoing, it is usually completely irrelevant for an accuser to bring 
up an event that was settled last year.  So too is the accused's 
behaviour toward a third person who is not part of the case.  That third 
person may have a higher tolerance level for silliness. 

Ec