[WikiEN-l] Re: Transition to WikiDemocracy

[Anthere]

You did not understand me. I do not suggest that every one takes the 
role of an arbitrator in turn. I suggest that the pool of arbitrator is 
larger, and that people in *that* pool take turns.

Similarly, I honestly believe that there would be some benefit if some 
sysops found themselves not sysops from time in time.

Fred Bauder a écrit:
> This is not good because a great deal of experience is necessary to do
> arbitration well. We need to eventually get to the place where serious
> things are treated seriously and mere annoyances rather lightly. It takes
> quite a while to get to where the difference is observable.
> 
> Fred
> 
> 
>>From: Anthere <anthere8 at yahoo.com>
>>Reply-To: anthere8 at yahoo.com, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>>Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:17:39 +0100
>>To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org
>>Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Transition to WikiDemocracy
>>
>>
>>>(4) Alternately, we could try to develop a system of "policy juries,"
>>>through which everyone occasionally gets asked at random to participate
>>>in policy decisions. For a discussion of how policy juries work, see:
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarchy
>>>
>>>--Sheldon Rampton
>>
>>Better. I also like the idea to do the same with arbitrators (like a
>>jury)...and with sysops :-)
>