[WikiEN-l] Re: Wik's Vandal Bot

[Theresa Robinson]

Just wondering, is the argument that the current vandalism behaviour is
not a bannable offense, or that it isn't necessarily Wik?  If the first,
wow is the AC ever tolerant.

moink

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Fred Bauder wrote:

> Wik still has lots of clout. The arbitration committee even now is not
> willing to ban him indefinitely. Still in wet noodle mode...
>
> Fred
>
> > From: Denni <dwindrim at shaw.ca>
> > Reply-To: dwindrim at shaw.ca, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:31:30 -0600
> > To: WikiEN <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> > Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Wik's Vandal Bot
> >
> > When the action of one user has an impact such as this on an entire
> > community, then there should be reasonable consequences. Certainly a
> > hard ban, whether for three months or one year or life would not be
> > inappropriate. It is time to kill the clowns.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>