[WikiEN-l] Protesting my ban

[David Gerard]

On 06/10/04 11:51, Fred Bauder wrote:

> He mentioned it as a point in argument. He did not threaten to invite 
> them. And in any event, according to established Wikipedia policy they 
> and their neonazi viewpoints are welcome. He may have technically broken 
> the three revert rule, but that is to be expected from a new user when 
> they first enounter determined opposition. His spam linking is not in 
> itself a violation.
> Due to the frustrating nature of dealing with this type of point of view 
> editor, your frustration is understandable, but you can't properly ban 
> folks, even of disagreeable views, if they follow Wikipedia rules.
> He tried, in a show of good faith, to discuss many of the controverted 
> points on the talk page of [[white nationalism]] but is not getting much 
> discussion on the points he raised.


I'll have a look too.

I mean, I'd have been happy to put up with Vogel if he didn't revert on
crack and whitewash so much. And could construct a grammatical sentence.
The tortured grammar is a significant part of the pain.


- d.