[WikiEN-l] Re: more questions

[Michael Snow]

Anthony DiPierro wrote:

>While we're discussing violation of the 3-revert guideline,
>let's also discuss violation of the guidelines on use of the rollback
>button, which is meant for reverting anonymous vandals.  I was neither
>anonymous nor a vandal, yet the first and majority of the reverts of my
>contribution were made using the rollback button.
>
It's meant for vandalism of any kind, anonymous or no. And yes, I agree 
that according to our policies, this situation should not be handled 
with the rollback button, which is why I brought up the point in the 
first place.

--Michael Snow