[WikiEN-l] Re: Trading with the Enemy
Anthere
anthere8 at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 29 03:20:17 UTC 2004
Delirium a écrit:
> Anthere wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Rick a écrit:
>>
>>> Where would you suggest? In France, it's illegal to criticize the
>>> government. In Germany, it's illegal to display Nazi memorabilia.
>>> In the UK there's the Official Secrets Act to deal with.
>>>
>>> RickK
>>
>>
>>
>> May I *seriously* suggest that you consider avoiding libel and
>> comments that might anger your peers RickK ?
>
>
> Well, according to the World Press Freedom Committee's document "Insult
> Laws: A Insult to Press Freedom"
> (http://www.wpfc.org/site/docs/pdf/Publications/Insult%20Laws-An%20Insult%20to%20Press%20Freedom-1996%20booklet.pdf):
>
> "...the primary form of this crime became known as 'insult to the
> president of the republic,' whose classic form was set in the French
> press law of 1881. It remains the basic press legislation in France
> today. The 1881 law also carries serious penalties for insulting
> foreign chiefs of state, foreign ministers or ambassadors of friendly
> countries, and official bodies like parliament, the judiciary, and armed
> forces... Similar provisions are on the books in Austria, Germany, the
> Netherlands, Norway, and Spain."
>
> The report goes on to note that the French law was last actually used
> under Charles de Gaulle in the 1960s, when a spectator was arrested for
> crying out "hoo hoo" at him. More recently the Sun was threatened with
> a lawsuit for insulting Chirac, though this never materialized.
>
> The report also notes that the French law has served as an example for
> many laws in other countries, especially less-developed countries, and
> especially former French colonies, that *are* enforced, and those
> countries defend their law under "well, France has such laws, so why
> shouldn't we?"
>
> So "illegal to criticize" is going too far, but it's not entirely
> without basis either.
>
> -Mark
So...wait a minute here...
If I understand well...
There is a law that says it is illegal to criticize the french governement
That law was used only *once* in 125 years.
It was exactly *44* years ago
And *we* should be considered responsible that freedom of speech is
*not* respected in *other* countries, because other countries took
example on us ?
And *that* would be an argument to claim France does not respect freedom
of speech and should not host Wikipedia ?
And *this* is not meant to be insulting ?
Please, consider this very carefully
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2003/countryratings/france.htm
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2003/countryratings/usa.htm
Compare
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2003/countryratings/israel-israeliadmin.htm
And consider
http://www.amnestyusa.org/waronterror/guantanamo/index.html
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list