[WikiEN-l] DNA article

[Charles Matthews]

Dan Drake wrote

> <snip> I wonder if a consensus might be possible on this: Any article
> that's showing a dispute-header is presumed to be a poor advertisement for
> the high quality of Wikipedia and must not be Featured until the problem
> is solved.

That means anyone can effectively 'censor' articles by disputing their
neutrality, for whatever reason.

> Would it be too dangerous if some level-headed people were authorized to
> remove such an article immediately from the list without waiting for the
> complete process at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates
> ?

Who decides who is level-headed, here?  Yes, too 'dangerous'.

Charles