[WikiEN-l] Re: Policing vs. judging (was: The Block Log)

[Anthere]

Poor, Edmund W a écrit:
> As a compromise between unregulated vigilantism and the established
> committee procedure, how about this?
> 
> Any admin has the right to temp-ban a user, BUT:
> 
> * Must report this ban to the mailing list of the encyclopedia from
> which the user is banned
> * The Arbitration Committee will immediately review the temp-ban
> 
> This is like letting any cop arrest a suspect, but requiring a judge to
> decide that very same day whether to put him in jail pending trial or
> release him on his own recognizance.
> 
> We are working in Internet time. So perhaps the full Arbitration
> Committee needn't meet to discuss the validity of a temp ban. Maybe only
> one A.C. member would be enough.
> 
> They could say, "Okay, Raul acted in good faith but we think user:Nutso
> isn't an "emergent threat" so we're overturning the temp ban. Please go
> through channels on this one."
> 
> Or they might say, "Yeah, what a pest! Temp ban sustained pending
> committee consideration."
> 
> Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed

Seems ok to me
With an add-on
Anytime, any other sysop may lift the temp ban as well

------

What happen if two sysops temp-ban and un-temp-ban more than 3 times the 
  problematic user in question ? :-)