Some people have been complaining that this hasn't been implemented yet, but I consider the results of the first poll too inconclusive to be certain. Therefore, I have written a provision for a new vote into the proposal. This new vote is not justified by the moanings of those disappointed about the first poll's result, but by the following:
* The provisions for preventing abuse of the process gained a very large following, and as such, have been severely reduced in size and merged with the original proposal; * The criteria have also been reduced in size, but not in meaning; * A 9-point Q&A section answering common concerns has been added; * A minimum edit count and registration date have been added to the prerequisites for voters; * A standard for minimum support to go ahead with the proposal has been added to avoid ambiguities.
As you can see, the proposal has changed quite a bit, and as such, I have felt justified in making provisions for a second round of voting. I hope those who have opposed and supported the proposal will not just vote, but actually *discuss* the proposal before passing full judgement on it. Those concerned may find the proposal located at [[Wikipedia:Preliminary Deletion]].
John Lee ([[en:User:Johnleemk]])