[WikiEN-l] original research

[Charles Matthews]

Sean Barrett wrote

>Even if such an
> Illuminatus really did exist, and someone really were able to penetrate
> it, it seems to me that the resulting exposé would be original research,
> and not appropriate for Wikipedia.

Think we should stick with 'Original research' being an 'argument to
delete', and not a 'proof of non-encyclopedic nature'.  It's a kind of goofy
pedantic point that personal knowledge of something should be disqualified.

Charles