[WikiEN-l] original research

[David Gerard]

Charles Matthews (charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com) [041206 06:48]:
> Stan Shebs wrote

> > [...]  but I
> > can see WP *creating* a demand for new original research, to
> > answer questions that have come up.

> I don't think 'original research' should cover original scholarship.  That's
> a stretch.


I don't think it is. Wikipedia is not somewhere people writing on a subject
should be coming to new conclusions.


- d.