[WikiEN-l] Re: WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 13, Issue 65 (was Wikipedia must change with Googling)
Jens Ropers
ropers at ropersonline.com
Fri Aug 27 01:57:12 UTC 2004
On 26 Aug 2004, at 23:02, wikien-l-request at Wikipedia.org wrote:
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:08:26 +0100
> From: Pete/Pcb21 <pete_pcb21_wpmail at pcbartlett.com>
> Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 13, Issue 65
> To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org
> Message-ID: <cglj4p$b6h$1 at sea.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Rick wrote:
>
>> Why not? It's going to bring up every article with the term "George
>> Washington" in it, and if [[George Washington's underwear]] begins
>> ... [[George Washington]] wore white [[boxer shorts]], then Google
>> will certainly pick it up.
>> that algorithm would be very much broken.
>
> If Google listed it that highly (in GW's case in the first dozen pages
> or so) then people are clearly interested in it, and that is a strong
> argument for having the article.
>
> Pete
'''Pete's paradox''', a concept from the fields of [[philosophy]] and
[[logic]], is a [[paradox|paradoxical]] series of statements, which can
be summed up as follows:
# [[Google]] returns unwanted search results which users are not
interested in.
# External causes to Google's delivery of unwanted search results are
defined as nonexistent.
# Google is implied to be perfect.
# Thus, users must be interested in the unwanted search results.
== See also ==
* [[Epimenides paradox]]
* [[Eubulides of Miletus]]' [[Liar paradox]]
[[Category:Flamebait]]
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list