[WikiEN-l] bans and blocks - proposed modificaion

[Poor, Edmund W]

>Yes, Martin is very often on-the-mark -- its good to see people seem to
recognizing 
>that. (Considering that at a certain point, I thought he was gonna get
banned. ;)
>
>~S~

 
<chuckle>, yes, I know what you mean. I thought I myself was going to
get banned when I first started at Wikipedia. Maybe it's the "reformed
sinner" who becomes the best proponent of goodness. That's one reason I
worked so hard to get Lir reinstated. Why, I must have spent at least
$500 worth of consulting time in behind-the-scenes negotiations.
 
Uncle Ed

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Stevertigo [mailto:utilitymuffinresearch2 at yahoo.com] 
	Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:14 AM
	To: English Wikipedia
	Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] bans and blocks - proposed modificaion
	
	


	"Poor, Edmund W" <Edmund.W.Poor at abc.com> wrote:
	 
	Martin,
	
	>You have my support for any changes you propose to the banning
and
	>blocking procedure. I trust your judgment and FWIW you have my
"proxy" -
	>you may even erase my 2 "objections" from [[Wikipedia:Bans and
blocks]],
	>as they are now obsolete.
	 

	 

	
  _____  

	Do you Yahoo!?
	The New Yahoo! Shopping
<http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=s%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%2Cslk%3A
text%2Csec%3Amail>  - with improved product search

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20030930/7c50ccd6/attachment.htm