[WikiEN-l] "New" logo JIMBO, PLEASE INTERVENE

[Richard Grevers]

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:28:39 -0700, Dante Alighieri 
<dalighieri at digitalgrapefruit.com> gave utterance to the following:

> At 08:10 AM 10/15/2003, Erik wrote:
>
>> At the point the logo was updated, there was virtually unanimous 
>> consensus
>> that the Nohat variant was an improvement (20 in favor, 2 against). This
>> satisfied the condition of the last stage of our contest, namely,
>> optimization by consensus. As in all such consensus discussions, only
>> interested parties participate. If you had looked around on Meta, you
>> would have noticed that these discussions have been going on since Oct 
>> 1.
>> What do you think where the variant submissions came from? The variant
>> process was broadly advertised at least on the English Wikipedia.
>
> That's all well and good. There's just one problem. The submission of 
> logos was announced on the main page of the Wikipedia. The voting for 
> logos was announced on the main page of the W. The second round of 
> voting was announced on the main page of the W. The final selection was 
> announced on the main page of the W.
>
> Where was the revision process announced?

On the main page of the Wikipedia. Otherwise I woudn't have found it.

-- 
Richard Grevers
Between two evils always pick the one you haven't tried