[WikiEN-l] Communist paper apologises but Wikipedia endorses the malicious claim!

[libertarian]

 --- On Sun 11/09, Fred Bauder < fredbaud at ctelco.net > wrote:

> Ok on 2 and 3, but 1 is just not factually established. 
> Additionally I think the article needs to mention the ambient 
> political athmosphere that produced 2 and 3 (regardless of the 
> cause of 1). Adequately describing that athmosphere involves 
> discussion of the Hindu Nationalist government of
> Gujurat and the climate of polarization which exists.

Notice your biases here.

a) (1) has been factually established. but you deny it.
b) "Hindu nationalist" is a loaded and factually incorrect term.
It smacks of hatred because those who are branded Hindu nationalists
by the West (this term is absent in India!) ask for EQUALITY and
removal of UNEQUAL LAWS.
c) (b) leading to points (2) and (3) in my earlier post can never
be factually established as they are not events but inferences 
made after analysis. Yet, you show your double standard by claiming
that the firebombing did not lead to the riots and is not a factual
statement.

I hope Wikipedia does not endorse your racist statements.

One other point. How come you use the racist phrase "Hindu
nationalist" (this is similar to branding Republican Party as
White Nationalist) but refuse to allow me to use the word 
Communist which is an exiting fact?

-libertarian

_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Introducing My Way - http://www.myway.com