[WikiEN-l] Admin nominations

[Alex R.]

LittleDan informed me that he nominated me, I'm not quite sure I should accept the nomination (I don't think it has been seconded). I'm a bit new here and willing to do my share of housekeeping if that is part of what being a good Wikipedian is all about, but if being a sysop is a status thing then I'm not really interested. From what I can glean about the formality of this place all nominations for sysops need to be seconded and since my nomination hasn't been seconded will it just expire at a certain point? 
alex756
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Daniel Ehrenberg 
  To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 9:07 AM
  Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Admin nominations


  oh, I thought Someone else, Slrubestien, and Hephestos already were sysops. As long as we're nominating people, I nominate User:Alex756. He's been a great contributer to wikipedia.

  Daniel Mayer <maveric149 at yahoo.com> wrote: 
    Danny wrote: 
    >I would like to nominate Slrubenstein as a 
    >sysop. He has consistently done excellent 
    >work for over a year. 

    I second that. So far these users have been nominated and seconded (most have 
    also been "seconded" by more than a few other people): 

    User:Slrubenstein 
    User:CatherineMunro 
    User:Hephaestos 
    User:The Anome 
    User:Someone_else 
    User:GrahamN 

    I'm going to try to get their consent now. 

    -- Daniel Mayer (aka mav) 

    _______________________________________________
    WikiEN-l mailing list
    WikiEN-l at wikipedia.org
    http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Do you Yahoo!?
  The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20030513/ea6c6e3a/attachment.htm