[WikiEN-l] sysop nominations

[Anthere]

> IMO the old way of promoting should be expanded to
> include nominations by 
> current Admins. And all nominations should be
> accepted with a single 
> "seconded" by another Admin unless there is somebody
> (Admin or not) on the 
> list that disagrees. <evil>If and when there is
> disagreement we can just drop 
> the nomination and not even tell the person that
> they were nominated.</evil>
> 
> We can continue to yell and scream whenever a
> controversial user asks to be an 
> Admin (like we are now) but uncontroversial users
> who tend to almost always 
> work nicely with others and follow NPOV (like the
> ones I listed, IMO) should 
> be promoted semi-automatically via nominations by
> current Admins. 
> 
> But we should tell them /right after/ their accounts
> are upgraded just so they 
> don't freak-out and think that a developer goofed
> and made all users Admins.
> 
> CRY HAVOC!
> 
> Sorry, I'm feeling particularly Evil (TM) tonight. 

hum Evil Mav (TM), I have an angelic question...(may I
?)

How do you plan exactly this semi-automatic sysop
granting to remain "secret" (unknown) to the candidate
provided that it has to be backed-up by two sysops,
and not to rejected by other sysops ? (hence to be
public somehow)

Hum...is there another list hidden somewhere just for
sysop I am not aware of ? Or is it that being non
sysop, I should not be reading this list ?
:-)))

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com