[WikiEN-l] Re. Susan Mason, I'm not clear what the problem is

[Graham Burnett]

> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:15:41 -0800 (PST)
> From: Zoe <zoecomnena at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re. Susan Mason, I'm not clear what the problem is
> To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org
> Reply-To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org
>
> --0-1802592526-1048119341=:49858
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> How many freaking times do we have to go over this?
> Zoe

Well I'm quite new to this mailing list, so forgive my ignorance, but it
seems that alot goes on 'behind the scenes' of wikipedia here, so again I'll
repeat my question, what did Lir do that made them so utterly iredeemable
(this is a genuine question, not rhetoric), and what is so wrong with Susan
Mason's edits? I just did a random trawl through a selection of SM's
contributions and they seem basically OK to me. She is alot more useful,
constructive and coherent than Micheal who is a complete nuisance who has to
be cleaned up after all the time (not that I want him banned either).

If Zoe doesn't have the patience to explain what is obviously utter crystal
clear to everybody else perhaps somebody else could spare a few seconds,
thanks,

Graham (Quercus Robur)