[WikiEN-l] Let's follow Wikipedia rules for the Gaia articles

[Anthere]

--- Toby Bartels <toby+wikipedia at math.ucr.edu> wrote:
> RK wrote in part:
> >Worst of all, the primary page [[Gaia theory]] is
> very
> >misleading...because Anthere refuses to let us
> discuss gaia
> >theory here!  Instead, she focuses on pre-gaia
> theory
> >theology and mysticism, and on radical left-wing
> politics! 
> >She forces any real discussion of Gaia theory into
> >sub-pages. That is bizarre. I don't know what her
> college
> >is like, but among *English* speakers, the phrase
> "Gaia
> >theory" refers exclusively to a scientific thoery.
> 
> This is certainly not true, as I know from personal
> experience.
> Perhaps it's true among those English speakers that
> RK hangs out with.
> 
> (Of course, RK also gave a false vandalism alert for
> an edit war,
> so he automatically loses it by my standards. ^_^)
> 
> 
> -- Toby

I fear I could be expecting to be a "troll" again very
soon :-(

I was apparently not offered the truce some suggested.
 I think the the phrase "Gaia theory" does not refer
exclusively to a scientific thoery.
Thank you to those of you morally supporting me :-)

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com