[WikiEN-l] too many edits???

[Anthere]

--- Erik Moeller <erik_moeller at gmx.de> wrote:
> Anthere-
> 
> > For sure, this cannot be a reason for banning.
> 
> It would be nice and an entirely new approach to
> things if people actually  
> started to read what I write.

I did read what you wrote :-)
I promise I did.
I always read what you write.
I rarely agree with you, but I like you nonetheless.
I rarely agree with you but your opinions are
supported, fair and interesting. So, I always read you
:-)

Among all your propositions, I found one I happen to
agree with. Which is "making a valid email adress when
registering a requirement".

I proposed to *enforce
> the existing ban* on  
> Lir.

But, it is not sure it is Lir

 For this, the threshold of annoyance should
> arguably be much lower.

If it is proved PP is Lir, you have enough of a reason
to ban her (along current trend of hard banning
anyway). If it cannot be proved PP is Lir, she must be
treated just as any other contributor. In which case,
the threshold has to be the same for her than for
anyone. You, Quercus, Lir or me.

> Furthermore, Lir's number of edits is excessive by
> any standard. At which  
> point does it get too much? 100 edits per page?
> 1000?

Ok. Let's set a number then :-)
I would say the treshold would be different for a list
than for a regular article.

Seriously, a much more important topic right now imho,
is the absolutely incredible slughishness (I really
can't find the right spelling, sorry) of Wikipédia.
Which is currently basically making it non editable
:-(((

> Regards,
> 
> Erik

Amicalement

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com