[WikiEN-l] Re: Clutch is on a POV tirade

[Poor, Edmund W]

Larry is right, and I'm getting of tired of carrying on 4 or more threads with Clutch.

Jonathan, the NPOV is what it is. Jimbo and Larry aren't going to change it, so I suggest you stop clutching at the hope that your arguing will pan out.

Now, please. Stop trying to change an immutable policy and focus on productive work -- such as your technical suggestions about namespaces, or providing *facts* for the articles -- or I'm going to leave you in the clutches of the peremptory reverters, bwah ha ha ha ha!

Ed Poor
P.S. If you think I'm bluffing, try me. :-|

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Sanger [mailto:lsanger at nupedia.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:25 PM
To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Clutch is on a POV tirade


I don't get it.  Why are we discussing the actual merits of Jonathan's
views of social workers?  That plainly doesn't advance the *on-topic*
discussion, which concerns the standards of neutrality, one iota.  To
bring this debate to an end, why do we have to do any more than observe
that there is a difference of opinion, and perhaps (on the relevant talk
page) discuss how to make the article reflects this sensibly and
neutrally?

Larry