You are not answering the question (not the first time). P27 has a lot of problems, due to
people using it for citizenship and nationality at the same time. Put this in combination
with the "fantastic" Wikipedia category system! AFAIK there is still some
discussion going on here:
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Nationality>
You can fix some items manually, but a good discussion and reform about how we structure
this kind of information is needed.
Greetings,
Sjoerd de Bruin
sjoerddebruin(a)me.com
Op 5 nov. 2017, om 12:04 heeft Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
Hoi,
There is much more to this. When a publication has been denounced, when the author is
denounced for having it ghost written. When ghost written is not to reflect because of the
stigma involved.. We should forcefully flag publications, findings and authors when there
is a problem.. A query should not include what they publiced what hey "found".
At this moment Wikidata is very much a stamp collection and we should be more than that.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 November 2017 at 11:40, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann(a)gmail.com
<mailto:marco.neumann@gmail.com>> wrote:
What's the current procedure for disputing a non trivial claim on a
wikidata item?
I know I can just go ahead and change a claim (statement and/or its
value) but the dispute itself would only be captured in the change-log
of the respective wikidata instance.
Would one create a discussion entry on the item page first to motivate
a change on an item that's not straight forward?
so for example on the item
Paul Staines
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16191299 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16191299>
it states that person has
:country of citizenship :United Kingdom
(a claim created by Rpfb119 on 1 April 2015 )
but on wikipedia-en it says nationality Irish without a reference
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Staines
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Staines>
is there or should there be a qualifier/reference to flag a statement
to be in dispute?
Also is this mailing-list the best place to discuss such (item
specific) matters? Or is the Wikidata community portal with the
Requests for comment service a better place?
thx
Marco
--
---
Marco Neumann
KONA
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata