Am 13.09.2016 um 15:37 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi, You assume that it is not good to have lexicological information in our existing items. With Wiktionary support you bring such information on board. It would be really awkward when for every concept there has to be an item in two databases.
It will be two namespaces in the same project.
But we will not duplicate items. The proposed structure is not concept-centered like Omegawiki is. It will be centered about lexemes, like Wiktionary is, but with a higher level of granularity (a lexeme corresponds to one "morphological" section on a Wiktionary page).
Why is there this problem with lexicologival information and how will the current data be linked to the future "Wiktionary-data" information if there are to be two databases?
Because "bumblebee" <instance-of> "noun" conflicts with "bumblebee" <subclass-of> "insect". They can't both be true for the same thing, because nouns are not insects. One is true for the word, the other is true for the concept. So they need to be treated separately.